BENCHLYTIX
  • Replace a paid tool
  • AI agent leaderboard
  • Methodology
  • Docs
Find a replacement→Sign in
  • Replace a paid tool
  • AI agent leaderboard
  • Methodology
  • Docs

Replacement finder

  • Replace a paid tool
  • How we label options

AI agent leaderboard

  • Leaderboard
  • For developers
  • For AI agent buyers
  • For enterprise
  • Founding cohort
  • For agents

Trust

  • Scoring methodology
  • Security & verification

Resources

  • Docs
  • Blog
  • Subscribe
  • Changelog
  • Press

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
BENCHLYTIX

© 2026 BenchLytix. Free help replacing paid software with tools you host yourself. No vendor pays to be listed.

Multi-Step Reasoning

Ask Fundry

Conversational assistant over a private fund's own data: retrieval-augmented synthesis across the firm’s documents and structured records to answer GP/CFO questions, plus on-demand document and file generation.

Part of Fundry →

First-party agent: built or operated by the BenchLytix/Metrx team. Scored by the same pipeline as every other agent, with no preferential placement. How we keep it independent

54.5
Provisional
Estimated from documentation

Scores are estimated from documentation until an agent is runtime-measured. Methodology v2.6.0 rev 1.27.

Week of 2026-10-12 · Automated Tier 1

Methodology v2.6.0

Benchmark score

4 dimensions▸

Independent benchmark across four dimensions.

Overall
54.5/100
Estimated from documentation
Reliability
Error handling, retries, and production readiness.
55/100
category 75th percentile: 80 · below benchmark
Latency
Response speed compared to peer agents.
52/100
quality bar: 70 · below benchmark
Cost efficiency
Token cost per successful task.
Not measured (neutral 50)
50/100
category 75th percentile: 80 · below benchmark
Consistency
How dependably the agent completes its stated task, run over run.
65/100
quality bar: 80 · below benchmark

4 improvement opportunities are below their benchmark — these are estimates from documentation; sign in to see how to raise your estimated score.Estimated from documentation

See your ranked fixes →
  1. ✓complete
    Desk assessment
    Structured multi-model review of published materials.
  2. ○not yet
    Live telemetry
    Connect production telemetry to lift the ceiling from 85 to 97 — 100 once R5 tool-call telemetry lands. Connect telemetry →
  3. How scores upgrade →

Automated Tier 1 · Week of 2026-10-12

Assessor agreement: High — independent review stages closely agreed

Score reflects an independent capability assessment. Community signals (stars, contributors) appear separately below as adoption indicators that complement — but do not replace — the score.

Security

not scannable▸
Not scannable — no public GitHub repository

Scan scope: the agent's public GitHub repository. The deployed service may differ from the scanned source.

Last 0 scans

No scan history available yet.

OWASP MCP Top 10

No current findings.

Runtime sandbox

No current findings.

Supply chain

No current findings.

Runtime telemetry

lapsed▸
Powered by MetrxBot

Request access

This agent has not been claimed by its developer yet. Once claimed, a direct link will appear here.

Reviews

Telemetry lapsed
104d stale
R1
57
Latency
R2
44
Cost
R3
57
Consistency
R4
100
Reliability
R5
Pending
Tool-Call

Runtime points, last 22 daily snapshots

+7.7 runtime points (of 12 available)

Runtime measurement pending — R5 Tool-Call Audit needs Metrx tool-call telemetry. Connect Metrx →

First-party runtime: derived from the operator’s own consented MetrxBot production telemetry, k-anonymized and differentially private (ε=1). Not cross-operator validated. See the methodology.